Rule 1: Write from scratch
Although there is a great temptation to make abstracts from the head of a term paper or a thesis, or even a paragraph, by reducing the text to the required volume, you should never do so. Such a “method” is unlikely to preserve the logic of the presentation of the material and convey the whole point of the report. In the worst case, there will be a set of broken thoughts that students are unlikely to be able to put together into a single picture. So before you write theses, bringing together their ideas on the subject of the report, clearly, imagine that you want to tell the audience, and write from scratch because, like writing an article in a newspaper or magazine in a review, but on a completely scientific level. Want to know more about the tipsfor writing a thesis? Click here Why? Let’s see the following rule:
Rule 2: Abstracts should be self-sufficient and understandable
After the first rough sketches, read the theses and consider whether they will be clear to your listeners and readers. Imagine if your classmates would understand them? Is the logic of the story visible from beginning to end? Are all statements argued? Are there links between sentences and paragraphs? Keep in mind, a good study is always different scientific novelty, which means that no one understands your subject as well as you yourself. It also means that things that are obvious to you may not be so clear to others. Try to look at your draft as if with other people's eyes, for example, a student from another department of your own faculty: would he understand your story? The rule of self-sufficiency means that the readers or listeners of your theses must understand, as a result, exactly what you want to say, and not half or ten times less. How to achieve this?
Check out Grammar and Spelling Errors Instantly Click Here
Check out Grammar and Spelling Errors Instantly Click Here
Rule 3: Write only the most important
When preparing abstracts, you should avoid quotes, long enumerations of proper names, complex sentences of more than 2 lines, care in related topics, detailed explanations and everything that does not relate directly to the goal. So we come to the most important part.
What should be the abstracts for the conference
1. Name
The name corresponds to the purpose of the work, it should be clear from what you want to tell. Typically, the title of the report and abstracts at the conference are the same.
2. Relevance
2-3 suggestions for why you are developing your theme. Relevance is derived from a scientific point of view, and not or every day. In other words, the relevance of the theses is their relevance at the present stage of the development of science. Think about how your work helps in the development of your chosen scientific field? What have you brought new? Why can this be interesting and useful to scientists?
3. The degree of scientific elaboration of the problem
3-4 sentences about the most important for studying your topic of scientific papers. It is necessary to write, what they turned out to be useful for you and the development of scientific problems that interest you.
4. Purpose
It is necessary to clearly identify the research design, i.e. designate what you wanted to do. The goal cannot be in the work itself: to study, examine, read is not the goal, but the process of the work itself! The purpose of this study may be the definition, identification, disclosure of patterns of something, etc.
5. Source (empirical) base of research
2-3 sentences to characterize the sources you used. Sources (empirical base) and research literature are completely different things!
6. The main part – thesis
A thesis is a summary of thought in one sentence. These differ from the usual text with a smaller amount of argumentation, explanations, additions - all this is left behind the text. In other words, these are a set of statements, each of which was obtained, proved and verified in the course of your research work, but the research process itself is not reflected in the text, only the results remain. If any listener is interested in details, he will be able to ask questions after the author’s speech. For the same reason, a footnote is usually not used in these, only a bibliography is given at the end.
7. Conclusion - the answer to the goal
Conclusions - the main distinguishing feature of a quality study. Conclusions should be meaningful, correspond to the goal, sum up what has been said, but not repeat the material already cited. In other words, the conclusion is, as it were, theses from theses, a few of your thoughts summarizing all the above. It should not be large - 5-7 lines, 1 paragraph.
