Rule 1: Write from scratch
Although there is a great temptation to make abstracts from the
head of a term paper or a thesis, or even a paragraph, by reducing the text to
the required volume, you should never do so. Such a “method” is unlikely to
preserve the logic of the presentation of the material and convey the whole
point of the report. In the worst case, there will be a set of broken thoughts
that students are unlikely to be able to put together into a single picture. So
before you write theses, bringing together their ideas on the subject of the
report, clearly, imagine that you want to tell the audience, and write from
scratch because, like writing an article in a newspaper or magazine in a
review, but on a completely scientific level. Want to know more about the tips
for writing a thesis? Click here Why? Let’s
see the following rule:
Rule 2: Abstracts should be self-sufficient and understandable
After the first rough sketches, read the theses and consider
whether they will be clear to your listeners and readers. Imagine if your
classmates would understand them? Is the logic of the story visible from
beginning to end? Are all statements argued? Are there links between sentences
and paragraphs? Keep in mind, a good study is always different scientific
novelty, which means that no one understands your subject as well as you
yourself. It also means that things that are obvious to you may not be so clear
to others. Try to look at your draft as if with other people's eyes, for
example, a student from another department of your own faculty: would he
understand your story? The rule of self-sufficiency means that the readers or
listeners of your theses must understand, as a result, exactly what you want to
say, and not half or ten times less. How to achieve this?
Check out Grammar and Spelling Errors Instantly Click Here

Check out Grammar and Spelling Errors Instantly Click Here

Rule 3: Write only the most important
When preparing abstracts, you should avoid quotes, long
enumerations of proper names, complex sentences of more than 2 lines, care in
related topics, detailed explanations and everything that does not relate
directly to the goal. So we come to the most important part.
What should be the abstracts for the conference
1. Name
The name corresponds to the purpose of the work, it should be
clear from what you want to tell. Typically, the title of the report and
abstracts at the conference are the same.
2. Relevance
2-3 suggestions for why you are developing your theme. Relevance
is derived from a scientific point of view, and not or every day. In other words, the relevance of the theses is their relevance at
the present stage of the development of science. Think about how your work
helps in the development of your chosen scientific field? What have you brought
new? Why can this be interesting and useful to scientists?
3. The degree of scientific elaboration of the problem
3-4 sentences about the most important for studying your topic of
scientific papers. It is necessary to write, what they turned out to be useful
for you and the development of scientific problems that interest you.
4. Purpose
It is necessary to clearly identify the research design, i.e.
designate what you wanted to do. The goal cannot be in the work itself: to
study, examine, read is not the goal, but the process of the work itself! The
purpose of this study may be the definition, identification, disclosure of
patterns of something, etc.
5. Source (empirical) base of research
2-3 sentences to characterize the sources you used. Sources
(empirical base) and research literature are completely different things!
6. The main part – thesis
A thesis is a summary of thought in one sentence. These differ
from the usual text with a smaller amount of argumentation, explanations,
additions - all this is left behind the text. In other words, these are a set
of statements, each of which was obtained, proved and verified in the course of
your research work, but the research process itself is not reflected in the
text, only the results remain. If any listener is interested in details, he
will be able to ask questions after the author’s speech. For the same reason, a
footnote is usually not used in these, only a bibliography is given at the
end.
7. Conclusion - the answer to the goal
Conclusions - the main distinguishing feature of a quality study.
Conclusions should be meaningful, correspond to the goal, sum up what has been
said, but not repeat the material already cited. In other words, the conclusion
is, as it were, theses from theses, a few of your thoughts summarizing all the
above. It should not be large - 5-7 lines, 1 paragraph.
0 Comments